MPEG LA LLC Corrupt Patent "Evalutor" wants to STEAL your Video Technology - Beware of MPEG LA Co-Licensing Scam

MPEG LA, LLC - Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney - MPEG LA Stole iViewit Technology and Illegally Patent Pooled the Technology.

Kenneth Rubenstein to this day, covers up the FACT that he helped MPEG LA get control of the Iviewit Technology (Video Codec, Video Compression Technology) and illegally put this Patent into patent pools.

MPEG LA LLC stole a 13 Trillion Dollar Video Technology and their was NO Co-Licensing. MPEG LA will Steal your Video technology and you will Have No Rights, no Money.

More on MPEG LA Stealing the Iviewit Technology for the iViewit Inventors.

Kenneth Rubenstein is So Far above the LAW as protected by Judicial Corruption in New York. Kenneth Rubenstein was long since protected by Corrupt Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye who protected her then husband Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose Partner.

Here are Some Documents on Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose.

1999 03 02 Kenneth Rubenstein letter to inventor Bernstein regarding how to do patents. Rubenstein states in deposition that he does not know Bernstein, never spoke with him and that he knew nothing about the inventions.

1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation a company that disappears although bills are generated through it.

Kenneth Rubenstein Starts Patent Pool

Kenneth Rubenstein - Above the Law Click Here

Proskauer Rose Connections - Crime Chart - Click Here

2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as patent counsel for an SBA Compliance Request for Crossbow SBIC Loans. This completely contradicts Utley Rubenstein and Wheeler deposition statements whereby they claim Rubenstein was never an Advisor, patent counsel and that he was not on Board.

1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist or perhaps it is another Proskauer owned entity involved in theft of the patents through a complex shell game with identically named and similarly named companies

1999 01 28 Letter from Iviewit to Albert Gortz of Proskauer Rose asking why Kenneth Rubenstein was not at Proskauer Rose as was told to Iviewit Shareholders and instead was found to be at Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel.

1999 02 17 - Interactive Week article where Intel engineers are quoted as stating the Internet, at speeds under 1.5Mbps, would be text based with banners, no video or imaging of quality at the lower bandwidths.

1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler letter regarding Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents. Rubenstein is patent expert reviewing the patents for patentability.

1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer letter regarding Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents.

1999 09 20 Meeting with Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Brian Utley, Steven Filipek of Fish & Richardson PC. The meeting was in New York at Rubenstein's Office, yet Rubenstein denies even knowing us other than to refer Joao in his deposition. Filipek had questions regarding the patents he viewed, claiming they appeared to miss the invention.

Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose Law Firm will Soon have his Licensed Suspended, Will Be Indicted for Trillions in Fraud. And Proskauer Rose LLP Law Firm and their Liability Insurance Carriers will pay Billions to Shareholders of Major Tech and Media Companies.

Below is Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose LLP Perjured Deposition

Part 1 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5T1ZtHBOC7E

Part 2 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rodS_EjIO6M

Part 3 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz58XzqDIOQ

Part 4 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIuERbs40c8

Part 5 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQbmAwr-oto

Part 6 @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0_bN7IzaGA


November 20, 2002 Kenneth Rubenstein of Proskauer Rose and MPEG LA's Deposition. Kenneth Rubenstein perjures himself repeatedly regarding acting as Iviewit Patent Counsel, contradicts Christopher Wheeler Deposition Statements and statements made to Judge Jorge Labarga.

Jorge Labarga had evidence of Perjured statements of Kenneth Rubenstein and threw the lawsuit as he threw the Bush v. Gore Presidential Election and ended Democracy in the USA.


http://www.deniedpatent.com/

http://www.iviewit.tv/

Posted here by
Investigative Blogger

Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

NSDQ: MSFT, Video Compression, NSDQ: GOOG, Alexis Devane, Kenneth Rubenstein, patent-licensing organization,V8 Format,Video Codec Technology, WebM Project, VP8 Patent Pool, MPEG LA Illegal Patent Pools, MPEG LA LLC, Proskauer Rose Patent Attorney, H.264 Video, Patent Licensing Group, Motion Picture Experts Group (MPEG), Video Codec, Google WebM/VP8, GOOG, Google VP8 Video Codec, MPEG LA Patent Royalties, Open Codecs, iViewit Technology

Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Perjured Deposition Proskauer Rose - MPEG LA for Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein

Part 1
Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Deposition
Proskauer Rose & MPEG LA for Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein.

Kenneth Rubenstein - Patent Attorney Proskauer Rose Partner



Hear More on Kenneth Rubenstein, Esq. Deposition Proskauer Rose & MPEG LA for Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein at Eliot Bernstein's Iviewit Technologies Channel - Click Here

More on the Iviewit Stolen Patent at
www.Iviewit.TV and www.DeniedPatent.com

MPEG LA involved in Major Video Technology Theft. MPEG LA LLC stole the Iviewit Video Technology

Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General.

More Iviewit Proof of Fraud and MPEG LA Involvement. Proskauer Rose LLP Corruption. Patent Fraud ?

June 10, 1999 - Letter From DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - JOEL I. KLIEN of the Antitrust Division - Assistant Attorney General

" Carey R. Ramos, Esq.
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison
1285 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10019-6064

Dear Mr. Ramos:

This letter is in response to your request on behalf of Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Time Warner Inc., Toshiba Corporation, and Victor Company of Japan, Ltd. (collectively, the "Licensors"), for the issuance of a business review letter pursuant to the Department of Justice's Business Review Procedure, 28 C.F.R. § 50.6.

You have requested a statement of the Department of Justice's antitrust enforcement intentions with respect to a proposed arrangement pursuant to which Toshiba will assemble and offer a package license under the Licensors' patents that are "essential," as defined below, to manufacturing products in compliance with the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats and will distribute royalty income to the other Licensors.

I. The DVD-ROM and DVD-Video Formats

The Standard Specifications for the DVD-ROM and DVD-Video formats describe the physical and technical parameters for DVDs for read-only-memory and video applications, respectively, and "rules, conditions and mechanisms" for player units for the two formats.

(1) In either format, the DVD has more than seven times the storage capacity of a compact disc; a single-layer, single-sided DVD, for example, can store 4.7 billion bytes (4.38 GB) of information including audio, video, text, and data. Employing compression technology, a DVD-Video disc can hold a 135-minute feature film on a single side.

The Licensors, along with a number of other producers of consumer electronics hardware, software, or both,

(2) established the Standard Specifications.

(3) These Standard Specifications appear to implicate the intellectual property rights of numerous firms.

II. The Proposed Arrangement

A memorandum of understanding among the Licensors (the "MOU," attached as Exhibit 1 to your letter) sets forth the central terms of the proposed arrangement, pursuant to which Toshiba will aggregate the Licensors' "essential" patents and disseminate rights under them to makers of Digital Versatile Discs (DVDs), DVD players, and DVD decoders

(4) ("DVD Products"), and distribute royalty income to the other Licensors. The arrangement will be carried out through a group of other agreements, including:

(1) a license that Toshiba will receive from each other Licensor to enable Toshiba to license users of the Standard Specifications under that Licensor's "essential" patents (the "Authorization Agreement," attached as Exhibit 3); (2) Toshiba's sublicense to makers of DVD Products under the Licensors' patents (the "DVD Patent License," attached as Exhibit 2);

(3) an agreement among the Licensors concerning the retention and authority of experts to select and evaluate the patents to be licensed (the "Expert Agreement," attached as Exhibit 4); and

(4) the "Ground Rules for Royalty Allocation" (attached as Exhibit 7), which set forth the formula that will determine how Toshiba will distribute royalties among the Licensors.

(5) A. The patents to be licensed In the MOU, the Licensors commit to license each other and third parties to make, use and sell DVD Products under their present and future patents that are "essential" to doing so.

(6) The Licensors agree to two separate means of carrying out this obligation. First, they agree to grant Toshiba the right to sublicense third parties under their present and future "essential" patents for these purposes, and Toshiba agrees in turn to sublicense those patents, along with its own such patents, in the DVD Patent Licenses.

(7) Second, each Licensor agrees to "offer to license its essential DVD patents on a non-exclusive basis to interested third-party licensees pursuant to separate negotiations on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, whether or not said third-party licensees intend to make, use and sell DVD products that are in conformity with the Specifications."

(8) A Licensor's patent is "essential," and thus subject to the commitments in the MOU, if it is "necessarily infringed," or "there is no realistic alternative" to it, "in implementing the DVD Standard Specifications."

(9) Initially, each Licensor will identify its own "essential" patents in an attachment to its Authorization Agreement with Toshiba.

(10) Toshiba will then incorporate those patents in a list attached to the DVD Patent License.

(11) Shortly, however, an expert individual or panel, with "full and sufficient knowledge and skill in the relevant technology,"

(12) will complete a review the patents each Licensor has designated as "essential" in order to determine whether they satisfy the MOU criteria.

(13).MOU, ¶ 8; Expert Agreement, preamble.

(14) At that time, any patent initially designated by a Licensor for inclusion in the DVD Patent License that the expert determines is not "essential" will be excluded from subsequent DVD Patent Licenses, although current licensees will have the option to retain it in their existing licenses.

(15) The expert will repeat this comprehensive review of all the patents in the DVD Patent License portfolio every four years.

(16) In between the quadrennial reviews, the proposed program also provides a mechanism by which the expert may review individual patents whose essentiality comes into question. If a Licensor comes to a good faith conclusion that a licensed patent is not "essential," and provides a reasonable basis for that belief, the expert will re-examine the patent.

(17) If the expert concludes that the patent is not "essential," the patent will be excluded from the DVD Patent License.

(18) The agreement provides that the expert's determinations are "conclusive and non-appealable," although the expert must submit a report explaining any decision that a patent was not "essential."

(19) Compensation will be at the expert's "standard hourly rates."

(20) Each Licensor will bear the cost of the expert's review of its patents; the Licensors will share costs attributable to all of them, such as time spent reviewing the DVD Standard Specifications.

(21) The expert, although retained by the Licensors and selected by a majority vote among them, will not have an economic affiliation with any individual Licensor.

(22) A majority of the Licensors may remove the expert for failure or inability to perform the duties set forth in the Expert Agreement "in a professional, competent, reliable or timely manner."

(23) Although the proposed licensing program currently includes the patents of only the Licensors, it is open to any owner of an "essential" patent willing to license on the program's terms and conditions.(24)


Full Letter and Source of Post
http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/busreview/2485.htm

Save and Print the Above for Your Records.

Note: over the Last year of Writing on iViewt the companies at the top of this post have been all over my Blogs, they Ignore what is happening because the UPSTO, US Judges, Corrupt Law Firms like Foley and Lardner and ALL on my blog at http://www.deniedpatent.com/ seem to be protected by US Billionaires and Politicians. THEY knwo that the Massive Shareholder Liability is Inevitable and Are Protecting themselve from it.

No ONE is Protecting Investors or Inventors.

More on the Massive Shareholder Fraud Coming Soon to a Pocket Book near You.

http://www.iviewit.tv/

http://www.jeffreybewkes.com/

http://www.deniedpatent.com/

GOOG, MPEG LA LLC,

MPEG LA illegally Using Iviewit Technology and Making Billions. What Does MPEG LA Management Think of the Stealing of Iviewit's Invention

What Does MPEG LA General Counsel Alexis DeVane think of the Massive Liability thatMPEG LA has taken on in Getting "in bed with" the Corrupt Patent Attorney KennethRubenstein of the Corrupt Law Firm Proskauer Rose.

MPEG LA is Illegally Licensing and making Billions Every year from the iViewit Technology that is Worth 13 Trillion Dollars and MPEG LA General Counsel Alexis DeVane along with other MPEG Management Ignores this Criminal Activity, Fraud, SEC Violations, RICO Complaint and Massive Liability to the MPEG LA Company.

There are over 1200 documents of proof, www.DeniedPatent.com - and Lawrence A. Horn President, CEO JP Gascon CFO, Alexis DeVane, MPEG LA General Counsel, DeanSkandalis Senior VP - Global Licensing and Compliance, William L. Geary, Jr. VP - Business Development, Jessica Sullivan Director - Royalty Services, Scott Mladinich Director - Information Technology, Tracy Edwards Director - Contract Administration, Allen HarknessDirector - Global Licensing, Heidi Moore Controller, and Jeffrey Westfall Director - Global Compliance, STILL ignore the massive lawsuits, liability, fraud, Criminal activity and Flat Out invention THEFT over the iViewit Technology Stolen Patent.

Lawrence A. Horn President of MPEG LA seems to NOT be concerned at all with a 13 Trillion Dollar Liability over the FACT that MPEG LA put STOLEN inventions in Illegal Patent Pools.

Dean Skandalis Senior VP - Global Licensing and Compliance Officer of MPEG LA seems to be in charge of MPEG LA illegally Licensing the Iviewit Invention in Which they HAVE no LEGAL Right to even be Using. And Dean Skandalis Senior VP is supposedly the Compliance Officer of MPEG LA, are You Kidding? MPEG LA steals a Technology and illegal puts this technology in Illegal Patent Pools and that does not raise and RED FLAGS FOR Dean Skandalis Senior VP - Global Licensing and Compliance Officer?

Jessica Sullivan Director - Royalty Services of MPEG LA surely knows of the iViewit Stolen Technology RIGHT? I mean it is Everywhere and MPEG LA is on my Whistleblower Media Blogs EVERY SINGLE DAY !!

More on the Iviewit STOLEN Technology that MPEG LA is Illegally Using

www.Iviewit.TV ...

Got a Tip on MPEG LA or anyone in this Post?

Email Me

Crystal L. Cox

Crystal@CrystalCox.com

MPEG LA, LLC - Kenneth Rubenstein Corrupt Proskauer Rose Attorney - MPEG LA Stole iViewit Technology and Illegally Patent Pooled the Technology.

Kenneth Rubenstein to this day, covers up the FACT that he helped MPEG LA get control of the Iviewit Technology and illegally put this Patent into patent pools.

Kenneth Rubenstein is So Far above the LAW as protected by Judicial Corruption in New York. Kenneth Rubenstein was long since protected by Corrupt Supreme Court Judge Judith Kaye who protected her then husband Stephen Kaye, Proskauer Rose Partner.

Here are Some Documents on Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer Rose.

1999 03 02 Kenneth Rubenstein letter to inventor Bernstein regarding how to do patents. Rubenstein states in deposition that he does not know Bernstein, never spoke with him and that he knew nothing about the inventions.

1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation a company that disappears although bills are generated through it.

Kenneth Rubenstein Starts Patent Pool

Kenneth Rubenstein - Above the Law Click Here

Proskauer Rose Connections - Crime Chart - Click Here

2001 01 17 Utley lists Kenneth Rubenstein as patent counsel for an SBA Compliance Request for Crossbow SBIC Loans. This completely contradicts Utley Rubenstein and Wheeler deposition statements whereby they claim Rubenstein was never an Advisor, patent counsel and that he was not on Board.

1999 01 15 Proskauer letter regarding Iviewit Corporation, a company that does not exist or perhaps it is another Proskauer owned entity involved in theft of the patents through a complex shell game with identically named and similarly named companies

1999 01 28 Letter from Iviewit to Albert Gortz of Proskauer Rose asking why Kenneth Rubenstein was not at Proskauer Rose as was told to Iviewit Shareholders and instead was found to be at Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolf & Schlissel.

1999 02 17 - Interactive Week article where Intel engineers are quoted as stating the Internet, at speeds under 1.5Mbps, would be text based with banners, no video or imaging of quality at the lower bandwidths.

1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler letter regarding Proskauer and Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents. Rubenstein is patent expert reviewing the patents for patentability.

1999 02 18 Christopher Wheeler of Proskauer letter regarding Kenneth Rubenstein review of patents.

1999 09 20 Meeting with Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, Brian Utley, Steven Filipek of Fish & Richardson PC. The meeting was in New York at Rubenstein's Office, yet Rubenstein denies even knowing us other than to refer Joao in his deposition. Filipek had questions regarding the patents he viewed, claiming they appeared to miss the invention.

Posted here by
Investigative Blogger

Crystal L. Cox
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

Crystal L. Cox, Investigative Blogger on the iViewit Stolen Technology

Part One, Crystal L. Cox, Thought on the iViewit Stolen Technology

Part Two, Crystal L. Cox, Thought on the iViewit Stolen Technology

DeniedPatent.com

WhistleblowerMedia.com

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com

More on Proskauer Rose and the Iviewit Stolen Patent at

KennethRubenstein.com

ProskauerSucks.com

Intel Corp - INTC Press Release on Mass Fraud and Liabilities over iViewit Technologies.

"Open Letter to Intel Corp ( NASDAQ: INTC ) Board of Directors & Intel Shareholders RE: Inventor Eliot Bernstein & Iviewit Companies TRILLION DOLLAR RICO & ANTITRUST liabilities. Otellini & Obama Know!

Intel Corp (NASDAQ: INTC) Execs have Been Hiding a Very Big Secret from Board of Directors & Intel Shareholders for Over a Decade Now. Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox - Industry Whistleblower

Iviewit World Renowned Inventor Eliot Bernstein Attempted Murder via Car Bombing for Graphic Images see

www.iviewit.tv

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-open-letter-to-intel-corp-nasdaq-intc-board-of-directors-intel-shareholders-re-inventor-eliot-bernstein-iviewit-companies-trillion-dollar-ri-1297863660.html

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States of America

February 16, 2011 -- Reprint Courtesy of Totally Awesome Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox ~ Original Post Crystal Cox Blog

Open Letter to Intel Corp ( NASDAQ: INTC ) Board of Directors and Intel Corp Shareholders
Thursday, February 10, 2011

Intel Corp Executives have Been Hiding a Very Big Secret from Intel Corp's Board of Directors, and Intel Corp's Shareholders for Over a Decade Now.

Intel Corp is involved in a Stolen Technology Scandal over the IViewit Technologies, and Intel Corp CEO Paul Otellini has been covering it up. Then General Counsel Bruce Sewell also covered up this Massive Proven Fraud. This is FACT, there are Links in this Letter to Prove it.

For over a Decade the Corruption in Courts, Law Firms and in Government Agencies have Covered for Intel Corp Executives.

However, those days are over Now. And when it is time to pay the Iviewit Technology Inventors for their Inventions USED by Intel Corp for Over a Decade, well it will be the Intel Corp Shareholders and Intel Corp Board of Directors that pays for the Crimes and Cover Ups of the Intel Corp Executives.

Intel Corp has been Named in an SEC Complaint over the Stolen Iviewit Technology

SEC Complaint Naming Intel Corp

Intel Corp Has also been named in a 12 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO Lawsuit over the Stolen Iviewit Technology.

Iviewit TRILLION DOLLAR RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT

ATTENTION:
Jane E. Shaw
Ambassador Charlene Barshefsky
Wilmer Cutler Pickering
Susan L. Decker
John J. Donahoe
Reed E. Hundt
James D. Plummer
John M. Fluke
Frederick E. Terman
David S. Pottruck
Frank D. Yeary
Vice Chancellor, David B. Yoffie,
Max Starr and Doris Starr.

This Open Letter Will Go to ALL Intel Corp Board of Directors, Shareholders, Insurance Carriers and ALL Government Agencies Involved to serve as YET another Warning of what will happen to Intel Corp Shareholders. Just as in the Madoff Scandal, they CANNOT Say they Did Not Know. There is a Whole lot of Fact, Proof that they Did Know and DO Know RIGHT NOW.

Please Forward this Letter to ALL Intel Corp Investors, Shareholders, Directors, Executives that You Know of. This is a VERY Big Deal Financially. It is NOT a Hoax, Look at the Facts yourself and Warn Others.

The Stolen Iviewit Technology will Cost Intel Corp Investors, Shareholders Billions. CEO Paul Otellini of Intel Corp KNOWS of this Massive Shareholder and is NOT Disclosing to Intel Corp’s Board of Directors, Shareholders or Insurance Carriers.

It is Your Money, You Have a Right to Know that Billions will be Paid By Intel Corp in the Iviewit Technology Theft. It is not a Matter of IF, the Proof is ALL there. It is a Matter of When.
Here is Proof that Intel Corps. CEO Paul Otellini and then Intel Corp General Counsel Bruce Sewell knew of the Stolen Iviewit Technology and have Yet to Disclose to Intel Corps. Board of Directors, Shareholders or Insurance Carriers to this day.

Intel Corp ( NASDAQ: INTC ) Demand Letter

For More information on the iViewit Stolen Technology Go To

Denied Patent

More Links and Resources to Intel's Involvement in a 13 Trillion Dollar Technology Theft

INTEL SEC COMPLAINT – SHAREHOLDER FRAUD

Intel Shareholder Fraud over iViewit Technologies Still Undisclosed by Intel CEO Paul Otellini

More Proof on Intel Corp Cover Ups

SEC Galleon, Intel Capital Complaint

FTC Investigators Reports on MORE Cover Ups by Intel Corp

Intel Shareholder Fraud over iViewit Technologies Still Undisclosed by Intel CEO Paul Otellini

Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Crystal@CrystalCox.com
You are Either Part of the Problem or Part of the Solution. Silence is Betrayal..the LIE Will NOT Become the TRUTH On My Watch !!
---
End of Crystal Cox blog

FOR FULL PRESS RELEASE VISIT

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-open-letter-to-intel-corp-nasdaq-intc-board-of-directors-intel-shareholders-re-inventor-eliot-bernstein-iviewit-companies-trillion-dollar-ri-1297863660.html

---

*** Coming Soon from Crystal Cox … President Barack Obama Fully Aware of RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit involving his former employer Foley & Lardner and Michael Grebe !!!***

OBAMA AWARE OF FORMER EMPLOYER FOLEY & LARDNER INVOLVEMENT IN RICO INVOLVING CAR BOMBING ATTEMPTED MURDER OF US WORLD RENOWNED INVENTOR ELIOT BERNSTEIN

February 13th 2009 Letter to President Barack Hussein Obama II to enjoin The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General ~ Department of Justice

***Coming Soon – FL Governor Rick Scott & FL Attorney General Pam Biondi notified of alleged corruption & to be filed Petition for an Executive Order Appointing a Special Prosecutor for the Iviewit companies and Eliot Ivan Bernstein’s Formal Criminal Complaint Submitted for Criminal Prosecution to the State of Florida Nineteenth Statewide Grand Jury on Public Corruption, Case No. SC 09-1910

Extra! Extra! Iviewit Press Releases
Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein Files Criminal Charges Against NY AG Andrew Cuomo, Chief of Staff Steven Cohen & Asst AG Monica Connell w/ Gov David Paterson & NY Senate Judiciary Chair John Sampson

Christine C. Anderson NY Supreme Court Whistleblower Swinging @ New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo. Claims Governor Cuomo Violating Public Office & Aiding Abetting Criminal Obstruction of Justice! Iviewit

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel Corp, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner

CONFLICTS FORCE PROSECUTOR OFF MADOFF INVESTIGATION, SEE RELATED STORY: TRILLION DOLLAR IVIEWIT INVENTOR ELIOT BERNSTEIN FILES CONFLICTS & OBSTRUCTION MOTIONS AT US SECOND CIRCUIT & SDNY BK COURTS

Senator John L. Sampson NY Senate Judiciary Comm Hearing ~ Testimony of Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein Re Trillion Dollar Fed Suit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed…

MANHATTAN FED BANKRUPTCY JUDGE MARTIN GLENN UNDER FIRE FROM TRILLION DOLLAR IVIEWIT INVENTOR ELIOT BERNSTEIN AS RELATED FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWER CHRISTINE ANDERSON CALLS FOR FEDERAL SPECIAL PROSECUTOR

IVIEWIT TRILLION $$ FED SUIT DEFENDANT PROSKAUER ROSE SUED IN GLOBAL CLASS ACTION RE STANFORD PONZI
---
Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
iviewit@iviewit.tv"